This is implement in an extremely hacky way due to poor DBIx feature
support. Ideally, what we'd need is a way to tell DBIx to ignore the
errormsg column unless explicitly requested, and to automatically add a
computed 'errormsg IS NULL' column in others. Since it does not support
that, this commit instead hacks some support via method overrides while
taking care to not break anything obvious.
Depends on https://github.com/nix-community/nix-eval-jobs/pull/349 & #1421.
Almost equivalent to #1425, but with a small change: when having e.g. an
aggregate job with a glob that matches nothing, the jobset evaluation is
failed now. This was the intended behavior before (hydra-eval-jobset
fails hard if an aggregate is broken), the code-path was never reached
however since the aggregate was never marked as broken in this case
before.
incrementally ingest eval results
nix-eval-jobs streams output, unlike hydra-eval-jobs. Now that we've
migrated, we can use this to:
1. Use less RAM by avoiding buffering a whole eval's worth of metadata
into a Perl string and an array of JSON objects.
2. Make evals latency a bit lower by allowing the queue runner to start
ingesting builds faster.
Also use the newly-restored constituents support in `nix-eval-jobs`
Note, we pass --workers and --max-memory-size to n-e-j
Lost in the h-e-j -> n-e-j migration, causing evaluation to always be
single threaded and limited to 4GiB RAM. Follow the config settings like
h-e-j used to do (via C++ code).
`nix-eval-jobs` should check `hydraJobs` and then `checks` with flakes
(cherry picked from commit 6d4ccff43c41adaf6e4b2b9bced7243bc2f6e97b)
(cherry picked from commit b0e9b4b2f99f9d8f5c4e780e89f955c394b5ced4)
(cherry picked from commit cdfc5c81e8037d3e4818a3e459d0804b2c157ea9)
(cherry picked from commit 4b107e6ff36bd89958fba36e0fe0340903e7cd13)
Co-Authored-By: Maximilian Bosch <maximilian@mbosch.me>
It seemed there was no self-contained end-to-end test actually doing
this?!
Among other things, this will help ensure that the switch-over to
`nix-eval-jobs` is correct.
We should look into how to resolve this, but I tried some things and nothing really worked.
Let's put it skipped for now until someone comes along to improve it.
