12:34:12 hydra-server.1 | Use of uninitialized value $s in substitution (s///) at /home/vin/workspace/vcs/hydra/src/script/../lib/Hydra/Helper/CatalystUtils.pm line 283, <$fh> line 1.
Fix parsing breakage from #1003: assigning the lines to $lines broke chomp and the filters.
This test validates the parsing works as expected, and also fixes
a minor bug where '-' in features isn't pruned, like in the C++
repo.
I broke this when I added `me.` in f1e75c8bff
I added me. to disambiguate `id`, but:
* eval.id works on the per-build page
* me.id works on the other pages
* Just id works everywhere if I drop:
, prefetch => { evaluationerror => [ ] },
but this causes a query per row to collect the evaluationerror
records later, this becomes significantly slow on non-trivial
datasets.
Using evals->current_source_alias will use the correct alias
whether it is me or eval or something else.
DBIx likes to eagerly select all columns without a way to really tell
it so. Therefore, this splits this one large column in to its own
table.
I'd also like to make "jobsets" use this table too, but that is on hold
to stop the bleeding caused by the extreme amount of traffic this is
causing.
The database has these constraints:
check ((type = 0) = (nixExprInput is not null and nixExprPath is not null)),
check ((type = 1) = (flake is not null)),
which prevented switching to flakes in a declarative jobspec, since the
nixexpr{path,input} fields were not nulled in such an update
Co-Authored-By: Graham Christensen <graham@grahamc.com>
Fixes this error:
ERROR: failed to process declarative jobset test:inputs,
DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI::_dbh_execute(): DBI Exception: DBD::Pg::st
execute failed: ERROR: null value in column "emailoverride" violates
not-null constraint
Taken from `Perl::Critic`:
A common idiom in perl for dealing with possible errors is to use `eval`
followed by a check of `$@`/`$EVAL_ERROR`:
eval {
...
};
if ($EVAL_ERROR) {
...
}
There's a problem with this: the value of `$EVAL_ERROR` (`$@`) can change
between the end of the `eval` and the `if` statement. The issue are object
destructors:
package Foo;
...
sub DESTROY {
...
eval { ... };
...
}
package main;
eval {
my $foo = Foo->new();
...
};
if ($EVAL_ERROR) {
...
}
Assuming there are no other references to `$foo` created, when the
`eval` block in `main` is exited, `Foo::DESTROY()` will be invoked,
regardless of whether the `eval` finished normally or not. If the `eval`
in `main` fails, but the `eval` in `Foo::DESTROY()` succeeds, then
`$EVAL_ERROR` will be empty by the time that the `if` is executed.
Additional issues arise if you depend upon the exact contents of
`$EVAL_ERROR` and both `eval`s fail, because the messages from both will
be concatenated.
Even if there isn't an `eval` directly in the `DESTROY()` method code,
it may invoke code that does use `eval` or otherwise affects
`$EVAL_ERROR`.
The solution is to ensure that, upon normal exit, an `eval` returns a
true value and to test that value:
# Constructors are no problem.
my $object = eval { Class->new() };
# To cover the possiblity that an operation may correctly return a
# false value, end the block with "1":
if ( eval { something(); 1 } ) {
...
}
eval {
...
1;
}
or do {
# Error handling here
};
Unfortunately, you can't use the `defined` function to test the result;
`eval` returns an empty string on failure.
Various modules have been written to take some of the pain out of
properly localizing and checking `$@`/`$EVAL_ERROR`. For example:
use Try::Tiny;
try {
...
} catch {
# Error handling here;
# The exception is in $_/$ARG, not $@/$EVAL_ERROR.
}; # Note semicolon.
"But we don't use DESTROY() anywhere in our code!" you say. That may be
the case, but do any of the third-party modules you use have them? What
about any you may use in the future or updated versions of the ones you
already use?
The current implementation will pass all values to `create_or_update` method. The
missing values will end up as `undef` (or `NULL`) when assigned to `%update`.
Thus, for columns that are NOT NULL, when, for example, flakes are not used,
will result in a horrible:
DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI::_dbh_execute(): DBI Exception: DBD::Pg::st execute failed:
ERROR: null value in column "type" violates not-null constraint
DETAIL: Failing row contains (.jobsets, 118, hydra, hydra jobsets, src, hydra/jobsets.nix, null,
null, null, 1589536378, 1, 0, 0, , 3, 30, 100, null, null, 1589536379, null, null). [for Statement
"UPDATE jobsets SET checkinterval = ?, description = ?, enableemail = ?, nixexprinput = ?,
nixexprpath = ?, type = ? WHERE ( ( name = ? AND project = ? ) )" with ParamValues: 1='30',
2='hydra jobsets', 3='0', 4='src', 5='hydra/jobsets.nix', 6=undef, 7='.jobsets', 8='hydra'] at
/nix/store/lsf81ip9ybxihk5praf2n0nh14a6i9j0-hydra-0.1.19700101.DIRTY/libexec/hydra/lib/Hydra/Helper/AddBuilds.pm line 50
This change just omits adding such values to `%update`, which results in
PostgreSQL assigning the default values.
