fix list alignment

Signed-off-by: ahuston-0 <aliceghuston@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
ahuston-0 2024-07-07 19:00:43 -04:00 committed by Alice Huston
parent 9eb9379b5c
commit 2e6cfb42af

View File

@ -69,12 +69,12 @@ which do not have an associated issue must be tagged to the same. It is
**highly recommended** that all PR's be tagged to an issue but PR's should
not be rejected if they are not tagged to an issue.
Any issue or PR that is tagged to the project must have a priority (High/Medium
/Low) and an estimate (rough amount of time in hours) associated. Start date
and end date must be included for non-critical items (branches not beginning
with `hotfix/` or `urgent/`). This is done in order to understand effort and
criticality of the project item. Please see [Critical Issues](#critical-issues)
for further details.
Any issue or PR that is tagged to the project must have a priority
(High/Medium/Low) and an estimate (rough amount of time in hours) associated.
Start dateand end date must be included for non-critical items (branches not
beginning with `hotfix/` or `urgent/`). This is done in order to understand
effort and criticality of the project item. Please see
[Critical Issues](#critical-issues) for further details.
### Critical Issues
@ -87,13 +87,13 @@ rules.
- Critical issues may bypass the [quorum rules](#review-process), as long as the
PR has been tested on at least one machine
- Issues which bypass the quorum process must have a second reviewer tagged
- All critical issues which bypass the approval process must have an RCA issue
opened and the RCA logged into the `inc/` folder
- The second reviewer has 2 weeks to retroactively review and approve the PR
- If the retro does not happen in the given window, an issue shall be opened
to either re-review the PR or to revert and replace the fix with a
permanent solution
- Issues which bypass the quorum process must have a second reviewer tagged
- All critical issues which bypass the approval process must have an RCA issue
opened and the RCA logged into the `inc/` folder
- The second reviewer has 2 weeks to retroactively review and approve the PR
- If the retro does not happen in the given window, an issue shall be opened
to either re-review the PR or to revert and replace the fix with a
permanent solution
- Critical issues must be tagged to `Nix Flake Features` project, and must have
a priority of `High` and an estimate tagged. Start and end date are not needed